Report on Genetic Distance Comparisons Between Confirmed Haplogroup R-U106 and R-P312 FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) Tested Haplotypes
Author: David Weston, Co-Administrator, R1b-U106/S21+ Research Group
Source Data:
1. R1b-U106/S21+ Research Group, Oct 2009
2. R1b and Subclades Project, Aug 2009
3. R-P312 and Subclades Project, Aug 2009
4. All FamilyTreeDNA-hosted European YDNA and Dual Geographic DNA Projects, Aug 2009.
Reproduction Rights:
Permission to reproduce this report is granted for non-commercial use only on condition that it is kept in full with this credit page. All other uses are prohibited without written permission from the author.
Disclaimer:
This report has not been subject to peer review. Although every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy and completeness; it may contain errors of fact and/or omission. Notification of errors and/or omissions critical to the report conclusions may be sent to the author for document revision.
Table of Contents
Figure 1. 12-marker Haplotype Comparisons
Figure 2. 37-marker Haplotype Comparisons
Figure 3. 67-marker Haplotype Comparisons
Table 1. Summary Statistics for GD between R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes.
Table 2. Summary Statistics for GD between R-U106 haplotypes.
Table 3. 12-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
Table 4. 37-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
Table 5. 67-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
Table 6. 12-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
Table 7. 37-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
Table 8. 67-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
1. The question this report addresses is, “Can GD, i.e. the total difference in allele values between a YSNP-confirmed haplogroup R-U106 haplotype and an non-YSNP tested haplotype be used to determine haplogroup status?” To answer this question, GDs between confirmed haplogroup R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes were calculated. Haplogroup R-P312 is the closest relative in the YDNA haplogroup tree to R-U106 (ISOGG YDNA Haplogroup 2009 R tree.). Consequently, R-P312 is the haplogroup whose haplotypes are closest to and most likely to be confused with those of R-U106 in the absence of YSNP testing. GDs between R-U106 haplotypes themselves were also calculated to see how the spread of GDs between R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes compare. As the standard haplotype length testing offered by FamilyTreeDNA, the ability to determine R-U106 clade status using GD was considered for 12, 37 and 67-marker haplotype lengths.
2. Haplotype data for this report was compiled from the publicly available sources listed under ’Source Data’ on page 1 between August and October 2009. All haplotypes were tested by and confirmed as belonging to their respective haplogroups including known subclades by FamilyTreeDNA.
3. Genetic Distances (GD) were calculated between each R-U106 and R-P312 haplotype, and counted to determine their frequency and cumulative probability of occurrence. For comparison purposes, GDs were similarly calculated between each R-U106 haplotype and the other R-U106 haplotypes within the sample set. The results of these calculations are summarized in Figures 1 to 3 and Tables 1 to 8.
4. GDs were calculated using a MS Excel 2003 Visual Basic Application (VBA) procedure as the sum of the differences between each corresponding allele (marker) for each haplotype pair. The difference between Null and non-Null alleles was counted as 1. The multi-copy markers DYS385, DYS 389, DYS459, YCAII, CDY, DYS395 and DYS413 were assumed to be pair-wise equivalent, i.e. the ‘a’ copy in one haplotype corresponds to the ‘a’ copy in the second haplotype. For DYS464, the allele GD was calculated as the difference between the sum of the a, b, c, and d copies in each haplotype. The alleles DYS19b and DYS464e, f and g were excluded from the GD calculations. All figures and tables presented here were generated in MS Excel 2003.
5. Summary statistics for GDs between R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes, and between R-U106 haplotypes are shown in table 1 and 2.
|
Markers |
Median |
Min |
Max |
Range |
1st Percentile |
5th Percentile |
95th Percentile |
99th Percentile |
|
12 |
4 |
0 |
17 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
9 |
|
37 |
18 |
3 |
44 |
41 |
9 |
12 |
26 |
30 |
|
67 |
27 |
5 |
53 |
50 |
12 |
19 |
35 |
39 |
Table 1. Summary Statistics for GD between R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes.
|
Markers |
Median |
Min |
Max |
Range |
1st Percentile |
5th Percentile |
95th Percentile |
99th Percentile |
|
12 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
8 |
|
37 |
17 |
0 |
39 |
39 |
5 |
11 |
25 |
28 |
|
67 |
24 |
0 |
47 |
47 |
7 |
16 |
32 |
35 |
Table 2. Summary Statistics for GD between R-U106 haplotypes.
6. Detailed statistics are presented in graphical format in figures 1 to 3 and tabular format in tables 3 to 8 at the end of this report.
7. The statistical and graphical analysis presented here shown similar distributions around the median values for the R-U106/R-P312 and R-U106/R-U106 GDs, with only small differences in the spread comparison. 90% (difference between 5th and 95th Percentiles) of R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes will be between a GD of 1 and 8 at 12-markers; 12 and 26 at 37-markers; and, 19 and 35 at 67-marker haplotype lengths. This compares with a 90% of R-U106 haplotypes being between a GD of 1 and 7 at 12-markers; 11 and 25 at 37-markers; and, 16 and 32 at 67-markers from other R-U106 haplotypes. The R-U106/R-P312 GDs are shifted to larger values by only 1 at 12 and 37-markers, and 3 at 67-markers. This shows that the large majority of R-U106 haplotypes will be indistinguishable from R-P312 haplotypes in terms of GD since they will have the same GD values whether they are in fact belong to R-U106 or R-P312. 12-marker R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes remain indistinguishable except at the maximum observed GD values. However, only 9 GDs out of 874,611 calculations greater than the 12-marker R-U106/R-U106 max GD of 15; a frequency of 0.001%.
8. Where the differences in GD between R-U106 and R-P312 haplotypes are evident is the ends of the distributions for 37 and 67-marker haplotypes. No R-U106/R-P312 GDs were observed less than 3 on 37-markers over 709,866 calculations or 5 on 67-markers out of 435,199 calculations. A haplotype with a GD 2 or less on 37-markers or 4 or less on 67-markers from a confirmed R-U106 haplotype therefore can be assumed to also be R-U106 to near certainty. These are GDs typically observed between haplotypes related within the time since surnames have been in use.
9. For the R-U106/R-P312 calculations, a GD of less than 10 on 37-markers and 13 on 67-markers was observed in 1% of the comparisons. A GD less than these values between an untested haplotype and confirmed R-U106 haplotype thus provides a strong indicator that a likely haplotype belongs to haplogroup R-U106. A GD of less than 13 on 37-markers and 20 on 67-markers was observed in 5% of the comparisons. A GD less than these values with a confirmed R-U106 haplotype would indicate would be a good indicator that an untested haplotype is R-U106.
10. A GD of greater than 27 on 37-markers and 34 on 67-markers was observed between 1% of R-U106 haplotypes. A GD greater than these values between an untested haplotype and confirmed R-U106 haplotype can thus be used as a strong indicator that a the haplotype in question does not likely belong to haplogroup R-U106. A GD of greater than 24 on 37-markers and 31 on 67-markers was observed between 5% of R-U106 haplotypes. A GD greater than these values with a confirmed R-U106 haplotype would be a good indicator that an untested haplotype is not R-U106.
11. Calculations of GD between untested haplotypes and confirmed R-U106 haplotypes will not indicate haplogroup R-U106 status in the majority of cases. 12-marker GD comparisons are not a reliable indicator of haplogroup R-U106 status under any circumstance. 37-marker and 67-marker GD comparisons will indicate haplogroup R-U106 status for GDs of 2 or less and 4 or less, respectively; GDs typically observed amongst related surname groups. A GD of 10 or less on 37-markers and 13 or less on 67-markers provides a strong indicator of haplogroup R-U106 status. A strong indicator that an untested haplotype does not belong to haplogroup R-U106 is given by a GD with a confirmed R-U106 haplotype of greater than 27 on 37-markers and 34 on 67-markers.
Figure 1. 12-marker Haplotype Comparisons
(a)
(b)
Figure 2. 37-marker Haplotype Comparisons
(a)
(b)
Figure 3. 67-marker Haplotype Comparisons
(a)
(b)
Table 3. 12-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
3726 |
0.00426 |
3726 |
0.00426 |
|
1 |
26149 |
0.02990 |
29875 |
0.03416 |
|
2 |
78546 |
0.08981 |
108421 |
0.12396 |
|
3 |
137829 |
0.15759 |
246250 |
0.28155 |
|
4 |
171676 |
0.19629 |
417926 |
0.47784 |
|
5 |
166667 |
0.19056 |
584593 |
0.66840 |
|
6 |
129887 |
0.14851 |
714480 |
0.81691 |
|
7 |
84360 |
0.09645 |
798840 |
0.91337 |
|
8 |
45150 |
0.05162 |
843990 |
0.96499 |
|
9 |
19270 |
0.02203 |
863260 |
0.98702 |
|
10 |
7181 |
0.00821 |
870441 |
0.99523 |
|
11 |
2653 |
0.00303 |
873094 |
0.99827 |
|
12 |
1021 |
0.00117 |
874115 |
0.99943 |
|
13 |
354 |
0.00040 |
874469 |
0.99984 |
|
14 |
105 |
0.00012 |
874574 |
0.99996 |
|
15 |
28 |
0.00003 |
874602 |
0.99999 |
|
16 |
8 |
0.00001 |
874610 |
1.00000 |
|
17 |
1 |
0.00000 |
874611 |
1.00000 |
|
18 |
0 |
0.00000 |
874611 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (783) R-U106 Haplotypes; (1117) R-P312 Haplotypes
Table 4. 37-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
1 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
2 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
3 |
2 |
0.00000 |
2 |
0.00000 |
|
4 |
12 |
0.00002 |
14 |
0.00002 |
|
5 |
48 |
0.00007 |
62 |
0.00009 |
|
6 |
175 |
0.00025 |
237 |
0.00033 |
|
7 |
513 |
0.00072 |
750 |
0.00106 |
|
8 |
1266 |
0.00178 |
2016 |
0.00284 |
|
9 |
2861 |
0.00403 |
4877 |
0.00687 |
|
10 |
5648 |
0.00796 |
10525 |
0.01483 |
|
11 |
10442 |
0.01471 |
20967 |
0.02954 |
|
12 |
17334 |
0.02442 |
38301 |
0.05396 |
|
13 |
26383 |
0.03717 |
64684 |
0.09112 |
|
14 |
36654 |
0.05164 |
101338 |
0.14276 |
|
15 |
47353 |
0.06671 |
148691 |
0.20946 |
|
16 |
56113 |
0.07905 |
204804 |
0.28851 |
|
17 |
63403 |
0.08932 |
268207 |
0.37783 |
|
18 |
66709 |
0.09397 |
334916 |
0.47180 |
|
19 |
66743 |
0.09402 |
401659 |
0.56582 |
|
20 |
63143 |
0.08895 |
464802 |
0.65477 |
|
21 |
56489 |
0.07958 |
521291 |
0.73435 |
|
22 |
48199 |
0.06790 |
569490 |
0.80225 |
|
23 |
38432 |
0.05414 |
607922 |
0.85639 |
|
24 |
29822 |
0.04201 |
637744 |
0.89840 |
|
25 |
22447 |
0.03162 |
660191 |
0.93002 |
|
26 |
16258 |
0.02290 |
676449 |
0.95292 |
|
27 |
11370 |
0.01602 |
687819 |
0.96894 |
|
28 |
7655 |
0.01078 |
695474 |
0.97973 |
|
29 |
5280 |
0.00744 |
700754 |
0.98716 |
|
30 |
3483 |
0.00491 |
704237 |
0.99207 |
|
31 |
2218 |
0.00312 |
706455 |
0.99519 |
|
32 |
1325 |
0.00187 |
707780 |
0.99706 |
|
33 |
873 |
0.00123 |
708653 |
0.99829 |
|
34 |
522 |
0.00074 |
709175 |
0.99903 |
|
35 |
300 |
0.00042 |
709475 |
0.99945 |
|
36 |
163 |
0.00023 |
709638 |
0.99968 |
|
37 |
98 |
0.00014 |
709736 |
0.99982 |
|
38 |
66 |
0.00009 |
709802 |
0.99991 |
|
39 |
28 |
0.00004 |
709830 |
0.99995 |
|
40 |
20 |
0.00003 |
709850 |
0.99998 |
|
41 |
6 |
0.00001 |
709856 |
0.99999 |
|
42 |
5 |
0.00001 |
709861 |
0.99999 |
|
43 |
4 |
0.00001 |
709865 |
1.00000 |
|
44 |
1 |
0.00000 |
709866 |
1.00000 |
|
45 |
0 |
0.00000 |
709866 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (698) R-U106 Haplotypes; (1030) R-P312 Haplotypes
Table 5. 67-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-P312.
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
1 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
2 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
3 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
4 |
0 |
0.00000 |
0 |
0.00000 |
|
5 |
1 |
0.00000 |
1 |
0.00000 |
|
6 |
0 |
0.00000 |
1 |
0.00000 |
|
7 |
2 |
0.00000 |
3 |
0.00001 |
|
8 |
3 |
0.00001 |
6 |
0.00001 |
|
9 |
11 |
0.00003 |
17 |
0.00004 |
|
10 |
35 |
0.00008 |
52 |
0.00012 |
|
11 |
63 |
0.00014 |
115 |
0.00026 |
|
12 |
178 |
0.00041 |
293 |
0.00067 |
|
13 |
365 |
0.00084 |
658 |
0.00151 |
|
14 |
740 |
0.00170 |
1398 |
0.00321 |
|
15 |
1431 |
0.00329 |
2829 |
0.00650 |
|
16 |
2418 |
0.00556 |
5247 |
0.01206 |
|
17 |
4160 |
0.00956 |
9407 |
0.02162 |
|
18 |
6444 |
0.01481 |
15851 |
0.03642 |
|
19 |
9244 |
0.02124 |
25095 |
0.05766 |
|
20 |
13200 |
0.03033 |
38295 |
0.08799 |
|
21 |
17309 |
0.03977 |
55604 |
0.12777 |
|
22 |
21918 |
0.05036 |
77522 |
0.17813 |
|
23 |
26048 |
0.05985 |
103570 |
0.23798 |
|
24 |
29931 |
0.06878 |
133501 |
0.30676 |
|
25 |
33043 |
0.07593 |
166544 |
0.38268 |
|
26 |
34645 |
0.07961 |
201189 |
0.46229 |
|
27 |
34355 |
0.07894 |
235544 |
0.54123 |
|
28 |
33368 |
0.07667 |
268912 |
0.61791 |
|
29 |
31376 |
0.07210 |
300288 |
0.69000 |
|
30 |
28212 |
0.06483 |
328500 |
0.75483 |
|
31 |
24658 |
0.05666 |
353158 |
0.81149 |
|
32 |
20687 |
0.04753 |
373845 |
0.85902 |
|
33 |
16541 |
0.03801 |
390386 |
0.89703 |
|
34 |
13046 |
0.02998 |
403432 |
0.92701 |
|
35 |
9625 |
0.02212 |
413057 |
0.94912 |
|
36 |
7114 |
0.01635 |
420171 |
0.96547 |
|
37 |
5031 |
0.01156 |
425202 |
0.97703 |
|
38 |
3587 |
0.00824 |
428789 |
0.98527 |
|
39 |
2332 |
0.00536 |
431121 |
0.99063 |
|
40 |
1578 |
0.00363 |
432699 |
0.99426 |
|
41 |
1023 |
0.00235 |
433722 |
0.99661 |
|
42 |
589 |
0.00135 |
434311 |
0.99796 |
|
43 |
385 |
0.00088 |
434696 |
0.99884 |
|
44 |
221 |
0.00051 |
434917 |
0.99935 |
|
45 |
119 |
0.00027 |
435036 |
0.99963 |
|
46 |
76 |
0.00017 |
435112 |
0.99980 |
|
47 |
48 |
0.00011 |
435160 |
0.99991 |
|
48 |
15 |
0.00003 |
435175 |
0.99994 |
|
49 |
12 |
0.00003 |
435187 |
0.99997 |
|
50 |
5 |
0.00001 |
435192 |
0.99998 |
|
51 |
3 |
0.00001 |
435195 |
0.99999 |
|
52 |
1 |
0.00000 |
435196 |
0.99999 |
|
53 |
3 |
0.00001 |
435199 |
1.00000 |
|
54 |
0 |
0.00000 |
435199 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (563) R-U106 Haplotypes; (773) R-P312 Haplotypes
Table 6. 12-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
4251 |
0.01389 |
4251 |
0.01389 |
|
1 |
19273 |
0.06295 |
23524 |
0.07684 |
|
2 |
42087 |
0.13747 |
65611 |
0.21431 |
|
3 |
58902 |
0.19239 |
124513 |
0.40670 |
|
4 |
60925 |
0.19900 |
185438 |
0.60570 |
|
5 |
50990 |
0.16655 |
236428 |
0.77225 |
|
6 |
34344 |
0.11218 |
270772 |
0.88443 |
|
7 |
19677 |
0.06427 |
290449 |
0.94871 |
|
8 |
9789 |
0.03197 |
300238 |
0.98068 |
|
9 |
4010 |
0.01310 |
304248 |
0.99378 |
|
10 |
1382 |
0.00451 |
305630 |
0.99829 |
|
11 |
403 |
0.00132 |
306033 |
0.99961 |
|
12 |
101 |
0.00033 |
306134 |
0.99994 |
|
13 |
16 |
0.00005 |
306150 |
0.99999 |
|
14 |
2 |
0.00001 |
306152 |
1.00000 |
|
15 |
1 |
0.00000 |
306153 |
1.00000 |
|
16 |
0 |
0.00000 |
306153 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (783) R-U106 Haplotypes
Table 7. 37-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
9 |
0.00004 |
9 |
0.00004 |
|
1 |
16 |
0.00007 |
25 |
0.00010 |
|
2 |
21 |
0.00009 |
46 |
0.00019 |
|
3 |
41 |
0.00017 |
87 |
0.00036 |
|
4 |
61 |
0.00025 |
148 |
0.00061 |
|
5 |
125 |
0.00051 |
273 |
0.00112 |
|
6 |
273 |
0.00112 |
546 |
0.00224 |
|
7 |
594 |
0.00244 |
1140 |
0.00469 |
|
8 |
1149 |
0.00472 |
2289 |
0.00941 |
|
9 |
2128 |
0.00875 |
4417 |
0.01816 |
|
10 |
3693 |
0.01518 |
8110 |
0.03334 |
|
11 |
6074 |
0.02497 |
14184 |
0.05831 |
|
12 |
8973 |
0.03689 |
23157 |
0.09520 |
|
13 |
12548 |
0.05158 |
35705 |
0.14678 |
|
14 |
16370 |
0.06730 |
52075 |
0.21408 |
|
15 |
19445 |
0.07994 |
71520 |
0.29401 |
|
16 |
21998 |
0.09043 |
93518 |
0.38445 |
|
17 |
23139 |
0.09512 |
116657 |
0.47957 |
|
18 |
22934 |
0.09428 |
139591 |
0.57385 |
|
19 |
21570 |
0.08867 |
161161 |
0.66252 |
|
20 |
18989 |
0.07806 |
180150 |
0.74059 |
|
21 |
16067 |
0.06605 |
196217 |
0.80664 |
|
22 |
13163 |
0.05411 |
209380 |
0.86075 |
|
23 |
10249 |
0.04213 |
219629 |
0.90288 |
|
24 |
7595 |
0.03122 |
227224 |
0.93411 |
|
25 |
5411 |
0.02224 |
232635 |
0.95635 |
|
26 |
3827 |
0.01573 |
236462 |
0.97208 |
|
27 |
2537 |
0.01043 |
238999 |
0.98251 |
|
28 |
1627 |
0.00669 |
240626 |
0.98920 |
|
29 |
1103 |
0.00453 |
241729 |
0.99373 |
|
30 |
690 |
0.00284 |
242419 |
0.99657 |
|
31 |
368 |
0.00151 |
242787 |
0.99808 |
|
32 |
212 |
0.00087 |
242999 |
0.99896 |
|
33 |
116 |
0.00048 |
243115 |
0.99943 |
|
34 |
72 |
0.00030 |
243187 |
0.99973 |
|
35 |
34 |
0.00014 |
243221 |
0.99987 |
|
36 |
14 |
0.00006 |
243235 |
0.99993 |
|
37 |
11 |
0.00005 |
243246 |
0.99997 |
|
38 |
6 |
0.00002 |
243252 |
1.00000 |
|
39 |
1 |
0.00000 |
243253 |
1.00000 |
|
40 |
0 |
0.00000 |
243253 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (698) R-U106 Haplotypes
Table 8. 67-marker Haplotype Comparison Data – R-U106 with R-U106
|
GD |
Count |
Freq |
Cum Count |
Cum Prob |
|
0 |
4 |
0.00003 |
4 |
0.00003 |
|
1 |
9 |
0.00006 |
13 |
0.00008 |
|
2 |
11 |
0.00007 |
24 |
0.00015 |
|
3 |
12 |
0.00008 |
36 |
0.00023 |
|
4 |
14 |
0.00009 |
50 |
0.00032 |
|
5 |
23 |
0.00015 |
73 |
0.00046 |
|
6 |
39 |
0.00025 |
112 |
0.00071 |
|
7 |
31 |
0.00020 |
143 |
0.00090 |
|
8 |
37 |
0.00023 |
180 |
0.00114 |
|
9 |
79 |
0.00050 |
259 |
0.00164 |
|
10 |
164 |
0.00104 |
423 |
0.00267 |
|
11 |
278 |
0.00176 |
701 |
0.00443 |
|
12 |
484 |
0.00306 |
1185 |
0.00749 |
|
13 |
734 |
0.00464 |
1919 |
0.01213 |
|
14 |
1199 |
0.00758 |
3118 |
0.01971 |
|
15 |
1887 |
0.01193 |
5005 |
0.03164 |
|
16 |
2732 |
0.01727 |
7737 |
0.04891 |
|
17 |
4132 |
0.02612 |
11869 |
0.07502 |
|
18 |
5467 |
0.03456 |
17336 |
0.10958 |
|
19 |
7233 |
0.04572 |
24569 |
0.15530 |
|
20 |
8973 |
0.05672 |
33542 |
0.21202 |
|
21 |
10325 |
0.06526 |
43867 |
0.27728 |
|
22 |
11697 |
0.07394 |
55564 |
0.35122 |
|
23 |
12629 |
0.07983 |
68193 |
0.43105 |
|
24 |
12990 |
0.08211 |
81183 |
0.51316 |
|
25 |
12966 |
0.08196 |
94149 |
0.59512 |
|
26 |
12201 |
0.07712 |
106350 |
0.67224 |
|
27 |
11038 |
0.06977 |
117388 |
0.74201 |
|
28 |
9872 |
0.06240 |
127260 |
0.80441 |
|
29 |
8221 |
0.05196 |
135481 |
0.85637 |
|
30 |
6481 |
0.04097 |
141962 |
0.89734 |
|
31 |
4964 |
0.03138 |
146926 |
0.92872 |
|
32 |
3796 |
0.02399 |
150722 |
0.95271 |
|
33 |
2621 |
0.01657 |
153343 |
0.96928 |
|
34 |
1770 |
0.01119 |
155113 |
0.98047 |
|
35 |
1270 |
0.00803 |
156383 |
0.98850 |
|
36 |
749 |
0.00473 |
157132 |
0.99323 |
|
37 |
438 |
0.00277 |
157570 |
0.99600 |
|
38 |
280 |
0.00177 |
157850 |
0.99777 |
|
39 |
157 |
0.00099 |
158007 |
0.99876 |
|
40 |
89 |
0.00056 |
158096 |
0.99932 |
|
41 |
49 |
0.00031 |
158145 |
0.99963 |
|
42 |
29 |
0.00018 |
158174 |
0.99982 |
|
43 |
13 |
0.00008 |
158187 |
0.99990 |
|
44 |
10 |
0.00006 |
158197 |
0.99996 |
|
45 |
2 |
0.00001 |
158199 |
0.99997 |
|
46 |
2 |
0.00001 |
158201 |
0.99999 |
|
47 |
2 |
0.00001 |
158203 |
1.00000 |
|
48 |
0 |
0.00000 |
158203 |
1.00000 |
Sample Size: (563) R-U106 Haplotypes