Analysis updated 12 Sep 2011 - 1262 R-U106 haplotypes.2

DISCLAIMER: Although every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the analysis provided below is error-free, it has not been peer reviewed and may contain errors of fact and/or omission. If you do find or suspect errors please bring them to the attention of the Group Administrator, Dan Draghici.

Report on Genetic Distance Comparisons Between Confirmed Haplogroup R-U106 and R-P312 FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) Tested Haplotypes

R-U106 European Population Frequency

Participant Haplotype Comparisons1,3,4,5

Phylogenetic Trees6

Individual Allele Statistics1 (PDF format)

Allele Diversity1 (PDF format)

Haplotype Diversity2 (PDF format)

Unique Haplotypes (PDF format)

Notes:
  1. R1b-U106/S21+ Research Group European region defintions.
  2. Includes (151) R-U198 haplotypes from the U198/S29 Project and (114) R-L1 haplotypes from the Null 439 Project.
  3. R-M269 modal derived from Charles Kerchner's R1b Subclades Project data and confirmed R1b-M269 YSearch entries as reported on John McEwan's R1b SNP Summary page.
  4. Click participant Surname/ID hyperlink in comparison table to view Genetic Distances (GDs) and Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA) between that participant and all other participants with the same number of markers. GDs were calculated using a hybrid model scoring the total difference between alleles, except for DYS464, which was scored as 1 for per difference on each copy; and, Nulls were which were scored as 1 for a difference from non-Nulls. TMRCAs were calculated to a 95% probability using the step-wise mutation model extended (SSME) and Individual Allele Model (IAM) detailed by Walsh, 2001. Multi-copy markers were excluded from the SSME TMRCA calculations and differences between Null and non-Null allele values were scored as 1. Due to numerical processing limitations a few TMRCAs, indicated by red surname were calculated use the IAM and scaled up by a factor of 1.3 to bring estimates more in line with usual SSME TMRCA values.
  5. Haplotypes have been sorted by individual allele mutation rate ranking from slowest to fastest, grouped by allele repeat value from smallest to largest, then resorted in FTDNA order
  6. Generated with the PHYLogeny Inference Package (PHYLIP) and Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) program from corresponding 37 and 67-marker haplotype comparison TMRCAs.